Languages:
 

Table 2. The potential risks following occupational exposure to nanoparticles (HSE 2004)

Synthesis process Particle formation Potential inhalation risks Potential dermal/ingestion risks
Gas phase In air Direct leakage from reactor
Product recovery
Post recovery processing and packaging
Airborne contamination of workplace
Handling of product
Cleaning/maintenance of plant
Vapour phase On substrate Product recovery
Post recovery processing and packaging
Dry contamination of workplace
Handling of product
Cleaning/maintenance of plant
Colloidal Liquid suspension Drying of product (processing and spillage) Spillage/contamination of workplace
Handling of product
Cleaning/maintenance of plant
Attrition Liquid suspension Drying of product
(processing and spillage)
Spillage/contamination of workplace
Handling of product
Cleaning/maintenance of plant

Source: SCENIHR  The appropriateness of existing methodologies to assess the potential risks associated with engineered and adventitious products of nanotechnologies (2006),
3.9.2 Exposure Assessment Approaches, p. 38

Related publication:
Nanotechnologies homeNanotechnologies
Other Figures & Tables on this publication:

Figure 1. Non-monotonic relationships of particle deposition as function of diameter in a healthy adult (Price et al, 2002)

Figure 2. Diagram of known and suspended mechanical clearance pathways for insoluble particles depositing in the pulmonary region (McCellan et al 1998)

Figure 3. Fate of nanoparticles in the environment

Figure 4. Possible relationship between particle size and toxicity

Figure 5. Toxicokinetics of nanoparticles

Figure 6. Exposure assessment algorithm

Figure 7. Algorithm of toxicodynamics of nanoparticles

Figure 8. Hazard identification

Table1. Particle Number and Particle Surface Area per 10 µgm-3 Airborne Particles. (Oberdörster G et al., 2005)

Table 2. The potential risks following occupational exposure to nanoparticles (HSE 2004)

Table 3. Comparison of nanoparticles in workplace air (Möhlmann, 2004)